Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Atlantic Privilege

From the Atlantic article 

"Where I Live, No One Cares About COVID"


Few articles provoke rage, but this one from the tweed wearing twit who bragged about flaunting restrictions (I spent 100s of hours in bars unmasked) and then engaged in gauche finger wagging (in oh so pristine prose) towards those concerned about covid. Did he lose a loved one? Watch them get really sick or die because of some entitled dumb ass like him. Well, I'm glad he's pleased with himself. Good for him. According to the article, this was the most embarrassing moment of his life:

"When I read such things, I experience the same secondhand embarrassment I felt upon witnessing an American tourist in Rome ask a waiter at a trattoria to remove the ashtray from the outdoor table at which the employee in question had just been smoking."


Seriously, fuck this guy.





Wednesday, October 13, 2021

Book Review: Strange Rites: New Religions For a Godless World by Tara Isabella Reed

Tara Isabella's Reed incisive work of non-fiction Strange New Rites: New Religions in a Godless Culture looks at how the digital world has changed spirituality in America and how it's now shaping culture and politics. Reed provides the historical context between conflicting impulses towards religious belief in America: the institutional vs the intuitional. Online life allows anyone to find meaning, purpose, community, and ritual among the like-minded. While the spectrum of belief emerging is wide ranging, they all share a fundamental distrust of institutions and are embracing alternative belief systems. These communities reflect both progressive and reactive impulses driving cultural discussions. 

The 21st Century has witnessed a dramatic rise in "nones" who check the "spiritual, but not religious" box on surveys. During the 2000s secularism and atheism appeared to be on the rise with bestselling polemics and viral YouTube clips by Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins "destroying" religious thinkers in debates. Yet the past ten years have revealed there's a deep spiritual hunger among Millennials and Gen Z. The famous Canadian media theorist Marshall McLuhan predicted the global village we now see appearing in digital and real life. Reed writes of a new generation of "remixers" combining and blending various spiritualities to suit their own personal tastes. Practice traditional Catholic liturgy by morning, some meditation on your Headspace App after a stressful work day, and maybe experiment with Tarot cards over the weekend. 

What I like about the book is that it reads like Sci-Fi film from the 70s that never got made. We're now in a world where a pop culture phenomenon can evolve into religious ones based on Star Wars or Harry Potter. Reed traces the mass popularity of Harry Potter contributing to a rise in beliefs in magic, witchcraft, and astrology among millennials. In recent years Potter fandom even turned on author J.K. Rowling for her controversial views on gender, of course it's nothing new for fandoms to turn on a creator. Reed writes, "Stories now exist not to teach us or inform us, but serve us." (87). In other words, fan service. While online toxic fan culture has been written about ad nauseum, there are some compelling possibilities in this new landscape, a chapter is dedicated to the Sleep No More experience, an interactive version of Macbeth that gained popularity a decade ago. Blurring the lines between creator, audience, and culture does hold untapped possibilities. 

Tom Wolfe's famous essay on "The Third Great Awakening" took a satirical approach to new spiritual currents during the 1970s, in some ways we're living in a more streamlined version of it. SoulCycle promises physical fitness and inner piece, only asking in return your heart and soul - and money of course. The same with various self-care products whether Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop or hyper-masculine products hawked on extreme right-wing outlets. Dating Apps offering services catered to specific tastes make huge profits. There's always a profit angle whether selling customized beads or dropping $200 an hour for a therapy session with Dr. "clean up your room" himself - Jordan Peterson. Megachurch pastors make millions of tax-free dollars, Hollywood celebrities moonlight as entrepreneurial influencers. 

Yet it's not like the 1970s either. Tribes forming and coalescing on various web platforms are influencing and changing political culture. Reed sees three distinct groups: the social justice left, the atavistic right, and the libertarian minded "tech-utopians." The "Gamergate" controversy from 2014 when angry dudes launched online verbal attacks on female video game designers and journalists marked one of the first notable confrontations. "Gamergate" was mere preliminary to the 2016 election, hailed as a victory for reactionary forces everywhere raging at the social justice movement, yet at the same time gave the social justice movement a common enemy to resist. 

Reed identifies religious thinking since the three groups have specific visions of the future. Right wing atavists, in their white supremacist world view long for an apocalypse, wanting the world to revert to a pre-modern ethos as preferable to a technological/ gender fluid civilization. Techies believe advances will pave the way for immortality and a capitalist paradise, maybe even the colonization of Mars (it will be Total Recall).

Social justice activists hope for a future almost free of injustice based on race, gender, or sexuality. The "call out culture" of social justice, a mass attack on social media towards someone expressing regressive views is according to Reed, the mark of a religion. Maybe? While the atavistic right revels in being overtly racist and sexist, triggering and harassing progressives defines their own identity. Right wing violence has spilled into the real world from self proclaimed incels (young men who blame feminism for all of their problems) and conspiracy theory fueled white supremacists. The January 6, 2021 terrorist attack on the Capitol marked a dangerous escalation, a point when a reactionary movement embarks on political violence.

Much of the divide also comes down to the classic nature vs nurture debate, or biology vs sociology. Social activists believe (aligning them with liberals) identity is shaped by social conditioning, while those on the right believe biology is fate. Yet much of their reasoning rests on pseudoscience rooted in 19th Century racism. Silicon Valley technocrats are lost in Sci-Fi fantasies, oddly emulating the antagonists of those stories. 

I don't think Reed is equating social justice activism with right wing extremism, since the goals of each are quite different, but many make the equivalency, arguing social justice is just as illiberal as the right (I would argue that's a false equivalency) One is rooted in the darkest forces of the past, the social justice movement is a continuation of the Civil Rights Movement in that both fight against injustice. That doesn't mean any movement, even if working for just purposes, should be above criticism.

Reed seems both fascinated and anxious with the growing tribalism in America, pondering if fragmentation become the driving narrative of the coming decades.  Did the election of Biden signal a rebirth of the center? What does the center even look like in this swiftly evolving landscape? Class is often left out of the conversation, a subject Reed also avoided, but it does warrant more coverage in this sociological puzzle. While a lack of economic opportunity does translate into reactionary politics gaining traction, it also begs for alternatives to capitalism. There's so much static these days, Strange Rites is a work that rises above the static.

Friday, September 17, 2021

And Summer 2021 is Ending Playlist . . .

 1) That Summer Feeling - Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers

 2) The Ballad of El Goodo - Big Star

 3) Total Trash - Sonic Youth

 4) You Never Know - Wilco

 5) Fall Breaks and Back to Winter - The Beach Boys






Friday, September 10, 2021

Book Review: Wild and Crazy Guys: How the Comedy Mavericks of the '80s Changed Hollywood Forever by Nick De Semlyen


For better or worse the debut of Saturday Night Live changed American comedy, the 2019 book Wild and Crazy Guys provides a group portrait of the male performers (there really needs to be a book on the female cast of SNL who are mostly ignored here). The book's focused on Chevy Chase, John Belushi, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Steve Martin, John Candy, Eddie Murphy, and Rick Moranis. For what the book lacks in providing insight on the era, it does provide a compelling rise and fall narrative. 

The debut of SNL, an outbranch of National Lampoon, is often cited as the moment boomer comedy went mainstream. Chevy Chase emerged as the star, his detached wisecracking persona and physical comedy propelled him to fame. Leaving the show in the middle of the second season, Chase embarked on a movie career. Chase looms large in the book, a difficult man but a constant presence throughout the Eighties. 

So much has been written on the early years of SNL, none more than on John Belushi. In the wake of Chase's departure (which he resented) Belushi raised to even greater heights of fame, at one point in 1978 simultaneously having a hit TV show, movie, and record album. His early death in 1982 from a drug overdose became a case study on how not to handle fame. While Belushi's exploits have been covered elsewhere, his quick fall continues to haunt those who knew him decades later. 

Meanwhile SCTV based in Toronto, more acerbic and polished than SNL, propelled the careers of many comedy stars. Avuncular John Candy and the cerebral comedy of Rick Moranis would also break into movies (among many others from SCTV). 

Steve Martin, a Californian, filled arenas with is "anti-comedy" stand up act and became a regular host on SNL. Comedy prodigy Eddie Murphy joined the show at age 19 and became the biggest star of them all. 

The shadow of Belushi hangs over the era despite his early departure. The 1980s became an age of excess and drugs, which often fueled the comedy. The fame and money that came to them tended to complicate their lives above all else. Chase became known for the amount of bombs he made, scoring the occasional hit. Bill Murray eschewed the spoils of fame and chose his projects with more caution. Martin grew tired of standup and embarked on a movie career, scoring a hit with the The Jerk, but would agonize over never being able to replicate the success of that film, although like Murray he graduated into more serious roles and became a critical darling. 

Murphy swiftly became the most versatile cast member on SNL and scored a string of early hit movies like 48 Hours and Trading Places. Ready to take over Hollywood, Murphy signed a major five picture deal with Paramount. He avoided drugs and alcohol, but totally embraced an extravagant movie star lifestyle. By the end of the 1980s, Murphy's career had also suffered after a string of misfires, mirroring the pattern of his peers, always trying to recapture the magic of the early years. 

Wild and Crazy Guys is built on anecdotes. Murray arrived on Ghostbusters after months of traveling the world filming his own ambitious film The Razor's Edge, tired and grouchy on the set but eventually taking to the material. During the filming of one of his most loved films Groundhog Day he was in the midst of a divorce and clashed with his director/friend Harold Ramis. John Candy was liked by everyone, generous to a fault. Tired of the game, Moranis retired from acting and now lives the quiet life. There's also the pariah of John Landis who directed so many comedies of the era, he's one of the book's primary raconteurs.

A breezy and engaging read, Wild and Crazy Guys covers a bygone age of comedy, which for all its faults, will continued to be studied. 


Friday, August 27, 2021

Podcast Review: Gene and Roger


The Ringer recently ended its eight-part podcast Gene and Roger, a retrospective on how a weekly TV show featuring two film critics influenced pop culture in their storied run from 1975-99. To those born after the show aired, they're a curiosity: two middle aged white guys from Chicago talking movies was a thing? Yet to any young movie fan who came of age when the show aired it was must see television. For anyone interested in their history - Gene and Roger is a fun place to start.

The podcast moves on two tracks: how their rivalry/friendship evolved over the decades and how film culture changed during their tenure. Both found their critical voices during the New Hollywood era. Ebert was a phenom on the literary scene at the University of Illinois, writing the screenplay for the Beyond the Valley of the Dolls. He got a full time gig at the Chicago Sun-Times reviewing films, and in 1975 earned the Pulitzer Prize for criticism (a first for a movie critic). Siskel graduated from Yale with a philosophy degree and became the movie critic for the Chicago Tribune. As competing writers in the same town, each developed a dislike towards each other in the early days. 

In 1975 they agreed to do a television show for PBS, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest was their first review. The tone was serious for the early episodes, but they eventually found a rhythm. Always competitive towards each other, a grudging respect developed. They were also film journalists, hustling to get the interview and exclusive from a star or director. Both savored the chance to be the first to write a review of a new movie, and even more to proselyte for an underdog movie. In 1982 their show Sneak Previews moved into syndication, and they became fixtures of pop culture, making regular appearances on talk shows, even hosting SNL at the height of their fame.

The podcast features narration and interviews with those who knew them best including family members, co-workers, and fellow critics. I always got the sense Ebert was generally more passionate about movies, while Siskel was more interested in movies as a reflection of culture. Ebert lived movies 24/7, watching and writing about them as if his life depended on it. Siskel had interests outside of reviewing movies, he spent a lot time at the race track. In the 1990s he became a fixture at Chicago Bulls games during the Jordan era. The most persistent myth is that they despised each other and always disagreed, when they usually agreed.

Their rise paralleled that of the Hollywood blockbuster, a trend they generally championed. Both loved Star Wars and Spielberg movies, famously defending Return of the Jedi against John Simon's blistering critique. They also made a point of discussing diversity voices in cinema, always reviewing at least one international film a week. Indie movies and filmmakers were championed alongside mainstream releases. Entire episodes were devoted to trends in movies, film history, and filmmakers. Film appreciation often took precedence over criticism. 

Gene and Roger creates a compelling narrative around their friendship and ends on a bittersweet note. They were antagonistic, but a respect developed over time.  They rarely socialized and moved in different circles, but each realized their together they had a chemistry that brought to fame. When Siskel was diagnosed with brain cancer he never informed Ebert about the seriousness of his condition.  In retrospectives Ebert always spoke highly of Siskel and would often get emotional. Ebert transitioned well into the social media, embracing twitter and keeping up with contemporary films despite the health problems that plagued him. 

The internet would change film discourse forever, no longer would a handful of critics in major markets dominate the discourse. In a way Siskel and Ebert midwifed a generation of crazed movie geeks with explosive opinions, making the internet their home base. They also introduced many to the wide variety of cinema available. Each had their weak spots. Ebert still gets dinged by horror fans for his dislike of slashers, while Siskel's takes often varied wildly, ranging from prescient to superficial. Most of it's all on youtube for anyone to view. 

If you want to go back and reminisce and reflect on the state of current film criticism, I'd recommend Gene and Siskel.

https://www.theringer.com/gene-and-roger-podcast

Saturday, August 14, 2021

A Kubrick Short Set in Ohio

 

"Margaret Stackhouse's speculations on the film [2001: A Space Odyssey] are perhaps the most intelligent that I've read anywhere, and I am, of course, including all the reviews and the articles that have appeared on the film and the many hundreds of letters that I have received. What a first-rate intelligence!"

- Stanley Kubrick, circa late 1960s          

March 6, 1999

          Guiding my nephew Robby over to the kid's section, which was oddly situated next to the horror section at Vince's Videos, I stood back waiting for him to pick out something, knowing he was fond of Pinky and the Brain and Power Rangers. Vince's seemed more active than usual for a Sunday, typically the day everyone returned their tapes. I noticed a gathering of customers at the classics section, and I heard someone say, "Stanley Kubrick died." The words got my attention, "Stanley Kubrick died." 

          My mind drifted back to 1986 all squiggly TV lines/harp sounds style when I worked at the video store to scrape through college, you could do that with part-time job back then. My co-workers were a social melting pot of working-class intellectuals, wannabee filmmakers, and college students like me. Most of all I remembered Lisa. 

          Lisa went to art school and for a time was the only female employee at the store, although she later got a few of her friends hired. There was a power structure. Video stores were a boy’s club, dudes endlessly debating the virtues and vices of American cinema. It wasn't like the 20-something cinephiles of today who proudly compare their Criterion Collections of Ozu and Bergman, Manhunter was considered the pinnacle of cinema in Mid-Eighties Ohio. There were many characters. A few I remember: Monroe made his own little films with Super 8 and blustered on all day about his favorite cult classics like Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia and The Mack. Travis majored in film studies, a sort of self-appointed cultural board of authority. 

          While Monroe and Travis clashed all the time, Lisa often jumped into the fray, pouring cold water on their egotistical rants. I typically stood clear when a fracas between the three of them broke out, but they are lodged in my memory. 

          If Monroe and Travis had anything in common, it was their endless fascination with Kubrick. Travis preferred the earlier New York City guerilla filmmaker fare like Killer's Kiss and The Killing, both progressing to the formalist precision of Paths of Glory and DrStrangelove. Monroe argued A Clockwork Orange was the true masterpiece, a dark and spectral vison of the future influencing all the arts from punk music to comics.

    On that particular day, a customer was renting out The Shining, providing Travis with the opportunity to recommend Kubrick's earlier work. A trigger for Monroe, he butted in with his opinion, "Don't listen to him, The Shining is great. You'll love it, almost as good as A Clockwork Orange."

    As the customer walked out, Travis was pissed at Monroe, "Stop interrupting me in front of customers!”

    Monroe cackled, "With all of your horrible recommendations I cannot remain silent. Last week you recommended Balthazar to a five-year-old child.”

    Travis, always ready to for a sparring match, "The Shining is an overlong exercise for anyone's patience. Nicholson is in self-parody mode, and Shelley Duvall cannot act." 

    Lisa jumped into the fray, "Nothing's more obnoxious than a guy critiquing a female performance. What do you know of acting Travis?"

    Travis in his most condescending tone sounding like a cardiologist proclaiming a diagnosis, "Kubrick only cast her because of that helpless look in her eyes. She was skilled at looking terrified - that's all."

     Fed up, Lisa threw a rhetorical wrench at them, "Besides, Kubrick is the most overrated director of all time anyway."

    They both snickered with wry amusement.

    Lisa continued, "All of his movies are about male obsessions. Women are pretty much absent."

    Travis jumped in, "My point exactly. Shelley Duvall has nothing to do but look terrified in The Shining. That sums up Kubrick's view of women."

    As per usual, the discussion gave Monroe a chance to deliver a rant, "I don't disagree with you Lisa. Most of his movies are fixated on men. Kubrick movies are a rite of passage. The pointlessness of war and bureaucracy in Paths of Glory and Dr. StrangeloveSpartacus and Lolita have their moments, but they're minor. 2001 expanded the possibilities of cinema, A Clockwork Orange made screen violence electric, disturbing, and thought provoking. Barry Lyndon is a beautiful, haunting film. The Shining is a masterpiece of modern horror. We're obsessed with his movies for reasons that are difficult to articulate, but they hit something primal within us."

    With a fierce look in her eyes indicating she was about to strangle Monroe, "You're full of shit. So full of shit."

    Monroe cackled, "You know I'm right."

    Lisa demurred, "Nope. You do know it was a 15-year-old girl who decoded 2001, way before all those male critics jumped in with their own interpretations. Look, his films provide insights into the male psychology as you just went to great lengths to point out. They're all about self-destruction. My takeaway from Kubrick: If the patriarchy isn't shattered like right now, before the year 2000 at least, humanity is doomed."

    Travis droned on about the humanistic messages embedded in Kubrick movies and I tuned out. When Full Metal Jacket came out a year later, I thought it paradoxically confirmed both Lisa and Monroe's points. The film acted as a warped recruiting tool for the Marine Corps, perhaps even more successful than Top Gun in the war propaganda department. 

                            *                    *                    *

    Robby had decided to go with the Power Rangers video. On our way out there was clerk, a dude, naturally, droning on about Kubrick and what a loss it was for cinema. I got the sentiment, but his need to display expertise was grating - and predictable. That’s it, one day people are wondering what your next project will be, the next you shuffle off the mortal coil, and the trajectory of conversations change. Stanley Kubrick was dead. 

 

 

 

 


Friday, July 2, 2021

Pre-Dawn Music

Thinking of many things, people I miss & places long gone.

Simple Twist of Fate - Bob Dylan

See No Evil - Television

Glory - Television

Days - Television

Sad Song - Otis Redding

You and Oblivion - Robyn Hitchcock

Little Lou, Ugly Jack, Prophet John - Belle and Sebastian 

Sweet Part of the City - The Hold Steady

Lost Love - Golden Smog